Skip to main content

City Planning Department

Community Planning Group Recommendations for Development Projects


1028 Muirlands Dr.

Project Number:

687245


Community:

La Jolla


Vote:

Approve: 16-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Approved on Consent: Regular Trustee Meeting 10/7/21


Distribution Date:


1570 Alta La Jolla Dr.

Project Number:

684820


Community:

La Jolla


Vote:

Approve: 16-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Approved on Consent: Regular Trustee Meeting 10/7/21


Distribution Date:


2989 Woodford Dr.

Project Number:

695191


Community:

La Jolla


Vote:

Approve: 16-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Approved on Consent: Regular Trustee Meeting 10/7/21


Distribution Date:


6444 Avenida Mañana

Project Number:

661877


Community:

La Jolla


Vote:

Approve: 16-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

Approved on consent: Regular Trustee Meeting 10/7/21


Distribution Date:


T Mobile Church Brethren

Project Number:

689155


Community:

Mid-City:City Heights


Vote:

Approve: 16-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


T-Mobile 40th Street

Project Number:

691621


Community:

Mid-City:City Heights


Vote:

Approve: 16-1-1


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


B. VIVA Logistics Center

Project Number:

683463


Community:

Otay Mesa


Vote:

Approve: 11--1


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


929 Grape Street

Project Number:

661279


Community:

Downtown


Vote:

Approve: 8-1-


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


Air Rights Tower

Project Number:

694291


Community:

Downtown


Vote:

Approve: 10-0-1


Conditions or Recommendations:


Distribution Date:


AT&T Small Cell Site

Project Number:

679945


Community:

Downtown


Vote:

Deny: 13-1-1


Conditions or Recommendations:

DCPC suggest city look seriously at replacing existing poles for shared utilization providing for next Internet of Things and next generation downtown. Motion supported by Jim / AT&T without delays that may result from RFP process. Friendly Amendment (Eddy) to advise city to also consider third party pole company, eg Crown Castle, to build pole and lease to carriers with priority being not add new poles per carrier. Kennedy confirmed third party would be acceptable, using existing infrastructure when available and adequate.


Distribution Date: